<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Any colour as long as it&#8217;s red: Why is lipstick branding so generic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/any-colour-as-long-as-its-red-why-is-lipstick-branding-so-generic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/any-colour-as-long-as-its-red-why-is-lipstick-branding-so-generic/</link>
	<description>JKR – Packaging Design Agency London UK, Branding Agency UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie Nairn</title>
		<link>http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/any-colour-as-long-as-its-red-why-is-lipstick-branding-so-generic/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Nairn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/?p=1777#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it is because red lipstick can appeal to so many segments of the female market that the advertising remains so generic.A little black dress,perfume and a red lipstick are items that are deemed essential to feminity and a red lipstick can work on every skintone,every age and for many different occassions.Red lipstick has a special place in a woman&#039;s mindset and even in history so it is possible that off the wall message appeals would make the company seem that they are &#039;missing the point&#039;.Personally I think the advertising could be better and the celebrity endorsements should be better.Marilyn Monroe or a 50s movies scene would be a better choice or perhaps an ad sequence portraying the life time value of red lipstick-from a toddler with mum&#039;s stolen tube smeared on their face to a grandmother wearing a classic pillar box red hue.I would prefer to see a move towards the Tiffany &amp; Co emotive style branding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it is because red lipstick can appeal to so many segments of the female market that the advertising remains so generic.A little black dress,perfume and a red lipstick are items that are deemed essential to feminity and a red lipstick can work on every skintone,every age and for many different occassions.Red lipstick has a special place in a woman&#8217;s mindset and even in history so it is possible that off the wall message appeals would make the company seem that they are &#8216;missing the point&#8217;.Personally I think the advertising could be better and the celebrity endorsements should be better.Marilyn Monroe or a 50s movies scene would be a better choice or perhaps an ad sequence portraying the life time value of red lipstick-from a toddler with mum&#8217;s stolen tube smeared on their face to a grandmother wearing a classic pillar box red hue.I would prefer to see a move towards the Tiffany &amp; Co emotive style branding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasia Gerali</title>
		<link>http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/any-colour-as-long-as-its-red-why-is-lipstick-branding-so-generic/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia Gerali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/?p=1777#comment-213</guid>
		<description>AVON has designed various retractable-lid lipsticks over the years, that are fuss free and neat.

Cargo&#039;s PlantLove range is the green answer to cosmetics. The lipstick tube is 100 % biodegradable and made entirely from corn. The outer carton is made with biodegradable flower paper, filled with real flower seeds, so essentially, it&#039;s plantable lipstick packaging.

The advertising though, as you mention, remains interchangeable and &#039;fish-finger-y&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AVON has designed various retractable-lid lipsticks over the years, that are fuss free and neat.</p>
<p>Cargo&#8217;s PlantLove range is the green answer to cosmetics. The lipstick tube is 100 % biodegradable and made entirely from corn. The outer carton is made with biodegradable flower paper, filled with real flower seeds, so essentially, it&#8217;s plantable lipstick packaging.</p>
<p>The advertising though, as you mention, remains interchangeable and &#8216;fish-finger-y&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara F</title>
		<link>http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/any-colour-as-long-as-its-red-why-is-lipstick-branding-so-generic/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/?p=1777#comment-212</guid>
		<description>As a make-up fanatic and addict I feel I can shed some light on this subject. Unless you are one of those women who puts their entire face on during their journey to work on a bumpy bus, the lipstick is the only item that you carry around and apply in front of others.
Therefore, if it&#039;s a cheaper brand such as Rimmel, you don&#039;t want the pack to be screaming, look I&#039;m wearing a £3.99 lippy! And if it&#039;s something sexier like a Chanel lipstick, every woman knows what it is. For example, I can tell a designer bag from a Topshop creation at a single glance, without seeing the branding.
On the other hand so many brands have launched gimicky lip products in strange and quirky structures ( such as double ended half gloss half lipstick, lipstick that won&#039;t even come off with a blow-torch, duo-lipsticks with topcoat etc etc) I hate all that stuff! Just give me a beautiful, sleek, sexy, simple lipstick any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a make-up fanatic and addict I feel I can shed some light on this subject. Unless you are one of those women who puts their entire face on during their journey to work on a bumpy bus, the lipstick is the only item that you carry around and apply in front of others.<br />
Therefore, if it&#8217;s a cheaper brand such as Rimmel, you don&#8217;t want the pack to be screaming, look I&#8217;m wearing a £3.99 lippy! And if it&#8217;s something sexier like a Chanel lipstick, every woman knows what it is. For example, I can tell a designer bag from a Topshop creation at a single glance, without seeing the branding.<br />
On the other hand so many brands have launched gimicky lip products in strange and quirky structures ( such as double ended half gloss half lipstick, lipstick that won&#8217;t even come off with a blow-torch, duo-lipsticks with topcoat etc etc) I hate all that stuff! Just give me a beautiful, sleek, sexy, simple lipstick any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

