<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cautionary tales of Photoshop disasters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/cautionary-tales-of-photoshop-disasters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/cautionary-tales-of-photoshop-disasters/</link>
	<description>JKR – Packaging Design Agency London UK, Branding Agency UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/cautionary-tales-of-photoshop-disasters/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/?p=1607#comment-171</guid>
		<description>As far as the Loreal advertisement goes, I think that perhaps they haven&#039;t got it so wrong. Yes, maybe the model&#039;s hair has been subjected to an outrageously large dose of the Photoshop treatment, however, the fundamental idea of the product is that it makes a woman&#039;s hair larger than life. For that reason maybe its a good thing that the model&#039;s hair comes across as unnaturally perfect. It certainly makes it stand out, and aside from the product itself (in the foreground) the model&#039;s hair should be the main focal point of the advertisement.
As far as the Garnier advertisement goes, they&#039;ve got it all wrong with the hands. They obviously look superimposed and take the attention away from everything else. This would certainly have been a case of less is more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the Loreal advertisement goes, I think that perhaps they haven&#8217;t got it so wrong. Yes, maybe the model&#8217;s hair has been subjected to an outrageously large dose of the Photoshop treatment, however, the fundamental idea of the product is that it makes a woman&#8217;s hair larger than life. For that reason maybe its a good thing that the model&#8217;s hair comes across as unnaturally perfect. It certainly makes it stand out, and aside from the product itself (in the foreground) the model&#8217;s hair should be the main focal point of the advertisement.<br />
As far as the Garnier advertisement goes, they&#8217;ve got it all wrong with the hands. They obviously look superimposed and take the attention away from everything else. This would certainly have been a case of less is more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

