<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subaru swapping substance for style?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/subaru-swapping-substance-for-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/subaru-swapping-substance-for-style/</link>
	<description>JKR – Packaging Design Agency London UK, Branding Agency UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hartswick</title>
		<link>http://www.jkr.co.uk/design-gazette/subaru-swapping-substance-for-style/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hartswick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jkr.co.uk/?p=4340#comment-356</guid>
		<description>The question is, is it possible to have both? You may get some die-hard Subaru fans claiming that they aren&#039;t sacrificing quality for style, they&#039;re just adding style to quality. I&#039;d be interested to know if the shift toward a more stylish vehicle necessarily means an inversely proportional reduction in functionality...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, is it possible to have both? You may get some die-hard Subaru fans claiming that they aren&#8217;t sacrificing quality for style, they&#8217;re just adding style to quality. I&#8217;d be interested to know if the shift toward a more stylish vehicle necessarily means an inversely proportional reduction in functionality&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

